Soil Structure Influences Root Growth and Carbon Storage

Soil matrix versus air-filled macropores

Model Of Root Growth, Soil Pores, And Carbon Fate

Examining the effects of soil structure on carbon inputs from roots to soil. Conceptual models depict a root (at left) growing through a dense soil structure, which implies a greater release of carbon from the root to the surrounding soil, and (right) a root growing through a wide soil pore with low root–soil contact. Roots growing into the soil matrix generate greater C inputs compared to the roots growing into macropores and biopores.
[Reprinted under a Creative Commons license (CC BY) from Lucas et al. 2023. DOI:10.1111/nph.19159]

The Science

Plant roots play an under-recognized role in trapping carbon in the soil. Plants remove carbon from the air through photosynthesis and use their roots to deposit it in the soil. Different sized pores dictate the transport of nutrients and water within the soil. This study tests whether the structure of soil affects how plant roots grow and distribute carbon. The study concluded that, for some plants, soil structure plays a pivotal role in determining how their roots will grow and how long the carbon transported from the plants will remain in the soil.

The Impact

Soil presents a huge opportunity to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and store it underground. However, a lot of the carbon stored in the soil is eventually returned to the air. Because climate change is primarily driven by atmospheric carbon dioxide it’s critical to examine how and why plants choose to optimize the amount of carbon they release into the soil. Comparing switchgrass and black-eyed Susan, this study found that higher contact between root and soil increases the release of carbon from plants to the soil. Though higher root–soil contact also leads to more carbon released into the atmosphere, the increased root–soil contact will eventually start to insulate the carbon underground.

Summary

Researchers with the Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center compared the root growth of two plant species: Rudbeckia hirta (black-eyed Susan) and Pancium virgatum (switchgrass) in switchgrass and prairie soils. Each soil was further separated into sieved and intact samples. Because sieving the soil disrupts its natural pore structure, the experiment measured the effect of soil structure on root growth. Researchers placed all four soil types separated by perforated material into single pots separated into cylinders. Researchers planted either switchgrass or black-eyed Susan in each pot. With the help of X-ray micro-CT scans of the soils, they could study how the root systems grew into the four soil types: sieved switchgrass, intact switchgrass, sieved prairie, and intact prairie.

Each plant was fed carbon dioxide “labeled” with a radioactive carbon isotope, allowing researchers to track the amount of carbon working its way into the soil surrounding the plants.

After harvesting the roots, the researchers found that black-eyed Susan’s roots adapted to the different environments and maintained high root-soil contact regardless of the soil structure its roots encountered. When switchgrass grew into either sieved soil or its own soil, it preferred to follow old root pathways in larger soil pores. Because its roots grew inside larger soil pores, its root–soil contact decreased and so did its carbon output. In intact prairie soil, however, switchgrass grew into denser soil structures.

Principal Investigator

Maik Lucas
Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University
[email protected]

Related Links

BER Program Manager

Shing Kwok

U.S. Department of Energy, Biological and Environmental Research (SC-33)
Biological Systems Science Division
[email protected]

Funding

This research was funded in part by the Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research program under award no. DE-SC0018409, by the NSF DEB Program (award no. 1904267), by the NSF LTER Program (DEB 1027253) at the Kellogg Biological Station, and by Michigan State University AgBioResearch.

References

Lucas, M., et al. 2023. “The Soil Pore Structure Encountered by Roots Affects Plant-Derived Carbon Inputs and Fate,” New Phytologist 240 (2), 515-28. DOI:10.1111/nph.19159.